Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Chinese journal of integrative medicine ; (12): 524-530, 2022.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-939771

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To explore the mechanisms underlying the proliferative inhibition of Chinese herbal medicine Kang-Ai injection (KAI) in gastric cancer cells.@*METHODS@#Gastric cancer cell lines MGC803 and BGC823 were treated by 0, 0.3%, 1%, 3% and 10% KAI for 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively. The cell proliferation was evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The apoptosis and cell cycle were evaluated by flow cytometry. Interleukin (IL)-6 mRNA and protein expression levels were detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA), respectively. The protein expression levels of cyclin A, cyclin E, cyclin B1, cyclin D1, p21, retinoblastoma (RB), protein kinase B (AKT), extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK), signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1 and STAT3 were detected by Western blot.@*RESULTS@#KAI inhibited the proliferation of MGC803 and BGC823 gastric cancer cells in dose- and time-dependent manner. After treated with KAI for 48 h, the proportion of G1 phase was increased, expression level of cyclin D1 and phosphorylation-RB were down-regulated, whereas the expression of p21 was up-regulated (all P<0.01). Furthermore, 48-h treatment with KAI decreased the phosphorylation level of STAT3, inhibited the mRNA and protein expressions of IL-6 (all P<0.01). IL-6 at dose of 10 ng/mL significantly attenuated the proliferative effect of both 3% and 10% KAI, and recovered KAI-inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation and cyclin D1 expression level (all P<0.01).@*CONCLUSION@#KAI exerted an anti-proliferative function by inhibiting IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway followed by the induction of G1 phase arrest in gastric cancer cells.


Subject(s)
Humans , Apoptosis , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Cyclin D1/pharmacology , Interleukin-6/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , STAT3 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics
2.
Journal of International Oncology ; (12): 671-676, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-954342

ABSTRACT

Objective:To observe the efficacy and safety of albumin paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 138 patients with advanced breast cancer admitted to Xiangyang Central Hospital from June 2018 to June 2021. The patients were divided into groups according to molecular type, number of treatment lines for albumin paclitaxel, number of metastatic sites, specific metastatic sites, past use of docetaxel and paclitaxel and combination therapy of albumin paclitaxel. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and treatment-related adverse reactions in different subgroups treated with albumin paclitaxel were investigated. Survival curves were plotted by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was performed, and multivariate analysis was performed by Cox model.Results:The mPFS of the overall population was 8.2 months. The mPFS of triple negative breast cancer, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) positive breast cancer and Luminal breast cancer were 6.4 months, 11.2 months and 8.1 months respectively, with a statistically significant difference (χ 2=7.42, P=0.025) . The mPFS of patients treated with first- and second-line albumin paclitaxel was 9.5 months, and the mPFS of patients treated with third- to seventh-line was 6.3 months (χ 2=3.86, P=0.049) . The mPFS of patients with ≤3 metastatic sites was 8.1 months, and the mPFS of patients with >3 metastatic sites was 7.0 months (χ 2=0.38, P=0.535) . The mPFS of patients with liver and brain metastases was 6.8 months, and the mPFS of patients with extrahepatic and extracerebral metastases was 9.6 months (χ 2=7.53, P=0.006) . The mPFS of patients who had previously treated with docetaxel and paclitaxel was 8.2 months, and the mPFS of patients who had not previously received docetaxel or paclitaxel was 9.6 months (χ 2=0.03, P=0.862) . The mPFS of patients with albumin paclitaxel combined with targeted therapy, combined with immunotherapy, combined with chemotherapy and monotherapy were 12.1, 7.8, 9.0 and 7.1 months respectively, with a statistically significant difference (χ 2=8.96, P=0.030) . Multivariate analysis showed that molecular type (triple negative breast cancer RR=1.87, 95% CI: 1.24-4.22, P=0.008; HER-2 positive breast cancer RR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.52-0.94, P=0.042) , number of treatment lines ( RR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.32-0.86, P=0.011) , specific metastatic sites ( RR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.12-2.75, P=0.014) and combination therapy (combined with targeted therapy RR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.16-0.86, P=0.021; combined with chemotherapy RR=0.93, 95% CI: 0.48-0.96, P=0.045; combined with immunotherapy RR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.17-0.78, P=0.032) were independent factors for prognosis. The main adverse reactions were alopecia, neutropenia, peripheral neurotoxicity and rash, and there was no death caused by adverse reactions. Conclusion:Albumin paclitaxel is effective in the treatment of advanced breast cancer with controllable adverse reactions.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL